How to Anonymise Your Situation
The read works on the structure
of your situation — not the names.
SKL Sets does not need identifying information to give you a useful read. Here is how to anonymise your situation before you start.
What to Replace
Names → Roles
Replace names with roles. The read is about role dynamics, not individuals. "The person named in the thread" becomes "the chair." "The named board member" becomes "the dissenting director."
Exact figures → Ranges
"Revenue declined from one exact figure to another exact figure" becomes "Revenue declined roughly 15% over two quarters." The quantum matters; the precision does not.
Identifiable company → Industry + size
"A named listed company" becomes "a large listed consumer goods company." The sector and approximate scale carry the relevant context.
Specific incidents → Dynamics
Replace "the meeting on 14 March when the chair asked about succession" with "a recent board conversation that raised the succession question unexpectedly." The pattern is what the read uses.
Identifiable geography → General region
"A regional expansion plan" can remain as-is. Specific building addresses, subsidiary names, or regulated entity identifiers do not need to be included.
Do Not Paste Into SKL Sets
Board minutes, resolutions, or filings
Legal correspondence, settlement terms, or privileged advice
Medical records or health information about yourself or others
HR records, performance reviews, or disciplinary documents
Regulator communications or compliance-sensitive material
Financial projections marked confidential or subject to NDA
Anything you could not defend sharing with a trusted senior colleague
Situation Read inputs are handled in the current browser session. If you save a Case Room while signed in or submit a Structured Review request, selected account or sanitized packet data may be stored as described in the Privacy Notice. The discipline of anonymisation also protects you if you use AI-ready prompts in external tools.
A Worked Example
Before
“A named director asked whether a specific strategic investment had been represented accurately in the latest internal review.”
After
“A director raised a concern in a recent committee discussion about how a material strategic investment had been framed.”
The second version preserves the role, trigger, context, and governance concern. The name, date, exact figure, company, geography, and transaction detail are not required.